truth

to many people truth is something that they value very highly. To many it is the pinnacle foundation by which they govern their beliefs, condition themselves, and base their perceptions, all of which in themselves are interpretations, and therefore are not logically truths. So lets explore what truth is, and what the difference is between 'true', 'truth' and 'a truth'.

Please bear in mind, that everything I say, is only my opinion.

Here are my definitions of the 3. 'True' is often seen as the opposite to false. But of course this cannot be true in itself, because there is only one true, but an infinite number of falses. So, true is the idea, in the mind of the enquirer, that they expect the observer to furnish their question with.

It is often made easier for the observer by limiting the options offered to between 2 and 4 options, one of which is the 'correct' answer according to the enquirer. 'True' is deemed to be 'straight'.

Truth is what is seen to be correct purely in the eyes of the beholder. It is a fact within the boundaries of a limited reality, thus it is not a truth to anyone outside that those boundaries.

'a truth' is where there are more than one possible correct answer.

So based on my opinion there is no holy truth. Everything in the macrocosm is beyond the comprehension of the mind we are immersed in, and therefore experiencing through. And everything below us in the microcosm is only true according to the rules that govern it, which only apply to the boundary of the reality we are experiencing. If belief is used to define the ideas that are beyond our comprehension, then based on the nature of it being a belief...it is clearly not a truth...although it can be a truth to me. If there was one universal truth such as a substance we and all things are immersed in that enables us to 'be', and to experience then this substance would still be outside the boundaries of our comprehension, for which we would then require a belief to quantify it's existence.

If whether we believe it or not...if it were the only fundamental truth which would mean it must be unchanging...for as soon as it changes...it is no longer true to our original perception of it, and therefore it has changed. If something is infinite...how can it be true, for the very nature of infinite is that is ever growing, and therefore ever changing. This would mean that only it's core fundamentals could be the truth, or that what changes is in fact possibilities, but from within a finite realm, but one that is so vast that it would appear infinite.

So based on this idea, lets not get too attached to the idea that truth exists at all. On the basis that there is no universal truth, then I am a God, because...truth is in the eye of the observer only. Therefore whatever I decide is true...is truth. If I decide that there is a universal substance that permeates all things, that responds directly to me, because I am the observer, then this is true for me. Even if it was the only fundamental truth that existed even without my deciding it so, then after that point, everything else is whatever I decide.

If I decided it didn't exist, then to me as an observer, this would be true, because this is what I have summoned from it. So based on this idea...my beliefs become very powerful tools for shaping this substance.

What makes a belief stick. If there are layers of belief, then what determines which one has rank over the other.

So lets look at those beliefs, and start reviewing which ones I have had that are no longer functional, and start implementing new ones.

I believe that I am able to do telekinesis, heal people, and animals, and can instantly manifest things on this plane. I have believed this for a very long time. What then shifts it from being a belief to being a creative influence of the creative substance.

Option 1. I am operating inside a reality that doesn't allow me to have those abilities here, or doesn't allow me to have those abilities until such time as I have passed some tests that prove I am responsible enough to handle the power.

The flaw in this argument is that I already have the power. And that others here and now have these abilities, and have had them in the past.

So what ever reason I do not have these abilities can be traced to me setting a rule to prevent myself from experiencing these.

ok, so lets look at my fundamentals. Things that I say over and over, or that I have obviously accepted as gospel.

My life goal to date was to understand the true creative process. Objective being to become a master on this plane. I have concluded it seems that this process could take me years. I have not made a decision that it must happen this year. This is a problem. This apparent lack of conviction means I am still hoping for it to occur. I am hoping that the idea is true. I have not decided and am expecting it this week, or today. I do not anticipate or work towards the experiencing of it, but rather allow it to orbit in my potential in the same way winning lotto does.

So the question is how to bring these ideas into my inner sphere to experience them from this perspective...now. When I can see how to connect to them. Up until now I have required that connection...which most often has been money, to give myself permission to pull something into my experiencing realm. So money is energy. So effectively when I have been able to see the energy that I have that can collect that idea I have in my outer orbit, it has brought it in to the inner realm. So what is the metaphysical equivalent? Is it simply seeing the mind substance and bringing it alive. I am experiencing all sorts of energies. Some of them are very destructive. But is there really destructive energy? Or is it that all energy is the same, but rather that some energy sent forth, does not have direction. I guess this is where I still don't really understand what I am. Am I energy being...that I direct, or send out. Or am I a constant energy being, that I simply reverberate a signal into the greater energy being, that is the mind that I am in. And every reaction I cause, causes an action back. So it is simply a case of in numerous series of vibrations, being a communication between I and the Mind substance. So no energy actually moves, but rather affects the particle next to it, which in turn does the same for an indefinite period of time, until it reaches it's intended destination. Ok, so here is another idea. We are a mind inside a mind inside a mind etc. To which boundary we hold our consciousness as we ask for something, will determine how far into orbit our vibrational intent will reach. So if I close my eyes and visualize something in my imagination, then I am not drawing it to me, I am window shopping, to consider things to bring into my orbit. If I expand my consciousness to up take the whole planet, then I have the capacity to experience it. This is also seeing that it is the experience that wants me to observe it. This is why we are trying not to get caught up in the small details of issues, because this then is where our consciousness shrinks to, and so our capacity to think outside the square is limited. Hence the idea of seeing the big picture empowers us to create big.